Search found 4 matches

by ReTodd
Thu Dec 02, 2004 7:33 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Mines - The END.....
Replies: 253
Views: 98820

Who remembers the time Cru defended their level ~70 against DC and the planet wasnt behind huge minefields? Ya that was awesome
by ReTodd
Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:49 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: new ship names
Replies: 14
Views: 7477

The HBC should be called a Destroyer, because that's what its supposed to be. And the dessy now is really a Battle Ship, but maybe give it a more exciting name that just Human Battle Ship. Something like vanquisher or Hero or Champion.
by ReTodd
Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Forum: Requires Discussion
Topic: Force expiration
Replies: 39
Views: 49328

That's exactly what I'm saying Freon. And those locations because they don't interfere with trading, but they are something that everyone wants and will fight for. What I really meant but didn't get across correctly is that locs important to trading (ie: IST, PSF, CA) shouldn't be inaccesible to tra...
by ReTodd
Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:57 pm
Forum: Requires Discussion
Topic: Force expiration
Replies: 39
Views: 49328

Rules 1-3 are good, but rule 4 looks like it will make little difference. Is the problem really mines in planet gals? Mines are necessary to defend territory and make it so that a gal of lvl 70's won't fall in one op. The problem as i see it (and correct me if i'm wrong) is mines in neutral gals cut...