SMR-CNN

Think this sounds good. Though I do not like the idea of wasting 300mil in mines without a real repercussion of turns as it takes today... that just costs the miner another 300mil This will be an issue if we keep moving the times around. If we get those weird times where only a couple euro players ...

Think this sounds good. Though I do not like the idea of wasting 300mil in mines without a real repercussion of turns as it takes today... that just costs the miner another 300mil

Think we should try one where there isn't planet galaxies... Just have a big ass tunnely neutral w planets strewn throughout... Instead of defining territories, let an alliance define why they can handle...

I would actually vote to increase the fed max offense... Green players currently font have many advantages against narcotics

But it makes the hug less valuable then the nuke.. No point to go good now really

i still say get rid of it, but yes nerfing it a bit would help make it less "easy" to get a good gun shell out.... same w/ WQSV... why is there a 250/o?? that needs to go way down

PPL ruined relation management. I vote to get rid of it

that makes sense too.. just have to figure out what a planet level = player level... ie is a level 9 port = level 50 player? prob nt but that could be massaged

same sort of thing w/ forces/planet

seems that Player to Player exp risk/reward can be there, but perhaps with planets it can be stock... for example, if i am adam w/ my 500k DC i know that there is a risk to fighting a 50k EOS... but if i do it ill get a little xp and if i lose ill lost a bunch because of his level... whereas w/ a pl...

just dont like how a CA used to be a place of action and dominance... now they are just granted to alliances by the smr gods