SMR-CNN

You're making alliances small again? I really don't see the point.

Let me just post all my concerns that I shared with RR privately: 1. Routes will be entirely dependent on random gen and some races could get shafted early on - Jester's idea might help solve some of these issues, but redoing a massive galaxy full of ports until we get a suitable combination is som...

why are CA always tied to a planet gal? maybe just put one CA right in the middle of the neutral... Because it always turns out to 1 alliance owning the CA and no other alliance being able to use it. p1 brings up a good point though. We should de-centralize CA's. If one alliance started mining it t...

I'm willing to change the times of the map evolution. 1 week was simply a placeholder. I expected there to be pushback but thought it was a good starting point. What if it were 3 days for the racials, 1 week post that for interracial trading, and then week 1.5 = neutrals? UG was supposed to be in e...

I've always like these ideas. My only caveat would be each race would need at least one peace at +500 relations for trading to work early. It would seem there would not be enough routes otherwise.

Different idea so points for that. Don't like it. This just causes the game to slow down. Maybe this idea works better if you get rid of the borders between racials and only allow people to go to neutral at a certain point. Keep all neutral weapons in outter gal and keep UG in outter gal too. So ea...

Yeah doesn't seem that was thought through. Maybe put an UG at a bar in each racial and you have to actual enter each bar to find the UG HQ.

I saw this one facebook. I thought it was just some random hippies you knew. Cool.

I think he means to say that when it's a solid line the galaxy has a definite stop/scare/corner to it via not letting sectors connect and if it not it can connect how the galaxy map renderer chooses. Is that correct?

You can travel to the other racials, they are connected yes?