SMR-CNN

I agree with what Jester is saying. It is unfair to force admins not to play, but if they do play they should know that they will get a lot of flack and 'accusations' and not complain about it like Blade did above. (I still believe the preferable situation is for them to not play though) I know when...

You will find this latest round was the first game I had played in a while, I did stop "playing" and administered the game from the background, that barely changed a thing apart from the people screaming this sucks admins dont play how do they know whats going on.[/quote] Bravo for you on ...

You are an admin in a lot of other games then?? Me, being a non-admin and normal player... I rarely see any complaints about admins. Admins see complaints about admins. And, it does happen in every game and every situation that has an inbalance of power, it is human nature. As for me, I do often act...

You're such a drama queen, honestly..... The number one rule when being in charge of any group of people in real life or online is that you cannot please everybody all the time. You do the best you can with the information you have at the time. That's all you can do. This silliness regarding the 'In...

Kinda a cool change.......

You won't be able to tell how many ships are around but if your planet is being attacked you will know if the sector above it is empty or not. Doesn't change gameplay too much.

The game is still fun, just lose some umph with loss of player base. The part I don't like is the insta gang bang 4+ people on with 1 person clearing. We need to even the game out a bit for single players or low active alliances. There is no reason for 1 person to clear anymore. The game has change...

I can only thing the 4 sector entrance thing must've been changed.

If that is so, at your level, 50% of the time 34 or more mines of a 50 stack will hit you.

They seem to cost twice as much as they are supposed to and when i shoot them they don't hurt me.

If you're in school can't you get it for like $30?

........................................................................................ @ this thread