SMR-CNN

I think that when you have 1 ship go in to a sector with lets say 2 or more ships of the same alliance... that the 1 ship should be able to attack 1 on 1.... ie he attacks one ship that fires back.... Now don't get all mad... it stays the same on the other end... the 2 to 10 ships still attack as a group but only when they do the attacking....


2ed part....

We need to fix the weapons in fights...

The person hitting attack.. should use all their weapons on the person they hit the attack page on... then the weapons of the rest of the alliance stay the same....Random hits....

I agree with the second part. It makes sense that your guns should go for the one you examine and your alliance mates take random shots at any other enemy allied ships in sector.

1st is dumb, no offesne, 2nd makes sense

I agree.. Don't like the first at all... second one is good.

I wouldn't mind seeing the first trigger target only the examined enemy, with enemy allies not involved until the second trigger (as a modification to suggestion 1).

Suggestion 2 is good.

Ardbeg wrote:I wouldn't mind seeing the first trigger target only the examined enemy, with enemy allies not involved until the second trigger (as a modification to suggestion 1).

Suggestion 2 is good.

mmm..Well, for me, the issue with 1v1 in fleet fighting is that is gives the advantage to the people with the fastest connection.

If we adopted you modification, the fastest people could fire once, cs, fire again perhaps on the same target before the fleet is aware they are there. This game is already too reliant on who has the fastest connection and adding the first suggestion, or the modified first suggestion, give more power to the faster people.

Im guessing Canff, you made this suggestion as a way to stop gang banging or to give smaller fleets a chance or something like that, but it will just give more power to the fastest.

You would never uno in a lvl 70 bust in peace again with suggesttion 1!!! Canff is going for teh ez killz !!!

Didn't SM do something like that near the end? I hated it.

umm i persoanlly disagree with canffs second suggestion. think about it that means who ever u fire at is dead . ur weapons which all fire at the target plus X amound of damage from rest of ur allaince.. almost gurantees a death in 1-2 shots

rejected