Crusaders

kerkem · Post by **kerkem** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:11 am

Well done crusaders.
i believe that you are the greater alliance of all time. With many valid reasons behind this.

*edited by mod

Kard · Post by **Kard** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:51 am

As and outsider watching, I would agree. Especialy when you count the achievements/hr online ratio lol, if there is such a thing. Crus gets far more done with far little online time.

Purify · Post by **Purify** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:42 pm

LONG LIVE THE CRUSADER DYNASTY!

frostiegurl · Post by **frostiegurl** » Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:53 pm

Chalk it up to 12 little crabbie mascots cheering us on from the security of their miniature ecosystems.

Oops I need to update my signature. I've acquired 5 more crablets since the last time

Penglund · Post by **Penglund** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:22 am

kerkem wrote:Well done crusaders.
i believe that you are the greater alliance of all time. With many valid reasons behind this.

*edited by mod

Good...YES! Greatest of all time NO!!!

Ardbeg · Post by **Ardbeg** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:58 am

Penglund wrote:
kerkem wrote:Well done crusaders.
i believe that you are the greater alliance of all time. With many valid reasons behind this.

*edited by mod
Good...YES! Greatest of all time NO!!!

Since SMR is constantly changing and evolving it is diffult to measure game impact over time, but I think Crusaders are approaching DC - although I wouldn't call either a dynasty (yet).

Post by **RandyOrsolo** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:58 am

Penglund wrote:
kerkem wrote:Well done crusaders.
i believe that you are the greater alliance of all time. With many valid reasons behind this.

*edited by mod
Good...YES! Greatest of all time NO!!!

I believe he said greater alliance. What that means is left up to the reader

.

We're just a bunch of scrubs who fly together and die together

.

kerkem · Post by **kerkem** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:06 am

umm i didnt post we are the greatest. Although that stands to reason.

Crus had a much better game than armoury. Dominating all aspects of the game equally in a ration far superior to armoury.

Edited because RO pointed out the a more reasonable solution

buttsack · Post by **buttsack** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:59 am

what does armory have to do with this thread? i thought it was a crusaders thread?

and what armory did doesn't even matter, we succeeded in playing the type of game that we decided to play- hunt, kill, trade. you guys succeeded in doing what you wanted to do best- planet busting, cream killing, fleet fighting (althou sometimes we give you good runs at that

).

After reading that can you really bring that as a reason as to why Crusaders had a good game? Instead of comparing them to Amrory, you should be showing the things that they did well! All of their successful OPs, counter OPs, mining efforts, and to some extent, game control.

Welldone Crus. C ya next round.

Post by **RandyOrsolo** » Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:32 pm

buttsack wrote: what does armory have to do with this thread? i thought it was a crusaders thread?

and what armory did doesn't even matter, we succeeded in playing the type of game that we decided to play- hunt, kill, trade. you guys succeeded in doing what you wanted to do best- planet busting, cream killing, fleet fighting (althou sometimes we give you good runs at that ).

After reading that can you really bring that as a reason as to why Crusaders had a good game? Instead of comparing them to Amrory, you should be showing the things that they did well! All of their successful OPs, counter OPs, mining efforts, and to some extent, game control.

Welldone Crus. C ya next round.

QFT, every alliance should be measured on their own merits

SMR-CNN

Crusaders

Crusaders

Re: Crusaders

Re: Crusaders

Re: Crusaders