SImply lame?

Discussions about everything, SMR related or not.

Gang bang after saying its gonna be 1v1...

so so lame
5
26%
very very lame
14
74%
 
Total votes: 19

Trade_warranT
Quiet One
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:02 pm

Post by Trade_warranT »

no lol I was trying to get Progressive, then boom who sold of all weapons as soon as he saw lotus ( who came for w/e reason donno y). then lotus saw famines MS few away from Ikky and told me to come help cuase he cant take it alone in a acarapase. i came we shot her he killed. then he started shooting me...
Trade warrants, get your trade warrants...

___*imagine this is a picture*___
PLAYING WITH COURAGE AND HONOR
MiA
Quiet One
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 3:50 am
Contact:

Post by MiA »

those options are both lame because they both point to the same answer(yes) you should also be able to vote something other then yes like a no or a i dont care :)
Purify
Newbie Spam Artist
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 9:25 pm

Re: SImply lame?

Post by Purify »

Trade_warranT wrote:From: PaIN (547) Date: 11/10/2006 11:27:35 PM
i said l not 1 l means 5 in AoC

From: TW's 4th Multi (29) Date: 11/10/2006 11:25:54 PM
thast jsut sad u lose a 2vs1...

From: PaIN (547) Date: 11/10/2006 11:22:02 PM
1402?
N.ator
Beginner Spam Artist
Posts: 1611
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:23 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by N.ator »

currently in the beta game 300 curu made it so the attack code so if more then one person from the same alliance is in the same sector as you, you all dont fire. now by having this the person actually has to earn his kills!. i think this would incourage more 1v1's and i personally think its more fun when you actually have to fire! :)
ImageImage
Post Reply