Who runs the game?

DemiGod · Post by **DemiGod** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:40 am

How does it fall under arranged kills? There is lots of things that could be included by the current definitions, including entering and firing against a larger fleet.

Izzanods · Post by **Izzanods** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:45 am

DG: that's what we're debating, so I can't go into it

DG: please don't provoke Ard or instigate trouble

adam_phg · Post by **adam_phg** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:45 am

Izzy: can u help me get this dog poop off my shoe?

Izzanods · Post by **Izzanods** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:47 am

sure P1---stick the shoe under the sink and run HOT water on it. That should work

DemiGod · Post by **DemiGod** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:47 am

Izzy: So we can't know anything about the discussion? Only the committee members get to be privy to what is happening in the game?

Freon22 · Post by **Freon22** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:47 am

I for one hope it is never coded into the game. The next thing will be some idea I heard of sometime back about leting ships link together. So has the leader moves all ships auto moves with him.

I will not even have to play anymore just link my ship and do what you want. I can then go and drink a beer login later to see if I got any kills or am in a pod.

It is a poor idea to let an alliance leader auto launch every member on a planet into space. There will be on point in being online when some alliance is hitting our planet. The leader can do the launching anytime he wants.

Izzanods · Post by **Izzanods** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:49 am

DG: To be honest, in theory, we're discussing a possible rule change perhaps, so, discussing it at the moment might not be the best idea--especially if nothing changes and people here the ideas/thoughts on the issue. We're not trying to hide anything, believe me---when it comes to planets and decisions I want what's best for the game

DemiGod · Post by **DemiGod** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:50 am

I would never say that you didn't Izzy, but I think alot of non-committee members want to be involved in the process.

Izzanods · Post by **Izzanods** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:53 am

when it comes to rules, the community and probably the committee have no say

Bob/PV/Jester as admins probably are the only ones that can change/revise the rules. In the end, it's on them, I think.

Thennian · Post by **Thennian** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:30 am

JJ there is a big difference between being in a neutral and sitting 12 deep in a galaxy in a tunnel with mines, not much danger there unless somehow another alliance called and op. Im not aruging it was a good tactic, and i give credit to lotus for doign it. I just dont think it shuld be allowed if you have ot leave your alliance and do it. I dont think too many people will argue that isnt a loop hole.