mines

Post by **seldum** » Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:44 am

mines should not carry over if mines do rollover damage than I want coded treaties

Freon22 · Post by **Freon22** » Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:48 am

seldum wrote:mines should not carry over if mines do rollover damage than I want coded treaties

I want, I want

Azool did not say anything about rolling over damage, re-read his post. But if I was coding this or had a say it would rollover damage and there still would not be coded treaties.

Edit: I think he will probably try to fix how singles are done and who know what else. But since he has come back he seems to be thinking more balance. Got to give the guy some credit.

LotuS · Post by **LotuS** » Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:30 am

Minezs ae4e crazyzs klol

JettJackson · Post by **JettJackson** » Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:34 am

people fail to realize the risk of single shield clearing, it requires you to be with only one shield, ie at the risk of dying to someone if they come and stop you, its not all benefit, like it is made out to be

LotuS · Post by **LotuS** » Wed Aug 15, 2007 5:43 am

If i can shoot you weak,
you deserve to die

JettJackson · Post by **JettJackson** » Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:00 am

already changed sadly

Implemented

SMR-CNN

mines

Re: mines