interest?
Moderators: JettJackson, Holti, jouldax
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 9:14 am
- Location: Hawaii
-
- Beta Test Team Leader
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:51 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
I totally don't agree... I say take bonding off planets. There was no issue with people taking planets before planet bonding why would we assume that people would not take a planet gal if we took it off now?
Most of the issues with taking up a planet gal lie in whether the galaxy layout is good for taking planets. I think work on the layout of galaxies needs to be looked at before people start to dismiss planets altogether as first option.
Plus Azool was going to be working on upgrading planets so that there is more of a reason to take them right? Well take the money off planets. (I mean RP wise how does a planet make money? There is no building on the planet for it, so far, do you magically mine your own money, and if so where is the turns spent doing that?)
Like I said earlier big alliances will always have more money than the rest(i.e. CYP and DC), it may not help the smaller alliances but it will give them SOMETHING to help them out. I think my strategy works much better, then modify the planets as we had planned so people will want to take them more, just like people actually goto the bars for a reason now.
Most of the issues with taking up a planet gal lie in whether the galaxy layout is good for taking planets. I think work on the layout of galaxies needs to be looked at before people start to dismiss planets altogether as first option.
Plus Azool was going to be working on upgrading planets so that there is more of a reason to take them right? Well take the money off planets. (I mean RP wise how does a planet make money? There is no building on the planet for it, so far, do you magically mine your own money, and if so where is the turns spent doing that?)
Like I said earlier big alliances will always have more money than the rest(i.e. CYP and DC), it may not help the smaller alliances but it will give them SOMETHING to help them out. I think my strategy works much better, then modify the planets as we had planned so people will want to take them more, just like people actually goto the bars for a reason now.
Founder of: Death Control, Life Control and The Order
Member of: DK, CM, EdL, Northstar, RR, FTV, FI, SPB, TD, LoM, LB
Member of: DK, CM, EdL, Northstar, RR, FTV, FI, SPB, TD, LoM, LB
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 9:14 am
- Location: Hawaii
And how does a bank make money? Unlike real world we have no inflation, no other currencies, no stock market. Banks have only costs(running all those branches).Vtreka wrote:(I mean RP wise how does a planet make money? There is no building on the planet for it, so far, do you magically mine your own money, and if so where is the turns spent doing that?)
-
- Beta Test Team Leader
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:51 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
You don't run a bank Blum so be quiet Ever hear of credit card debt and loans and mortgages? Where do you think all the money they make on interest from everyone's debts goes? You think they just say we'll give people free money?
Who cares where the banks get it from its an institution that creates interest for people's money, the planet doesn't do that... and while bank's are buildings on planets, you don't have to build them to get interest in game
Who cares where the banks get it from its an institution that creates interest for people's money, the planet doesn't do that... and while bank's are buildings on planets, you don't have to build them to get interest in game
Founder of: Death Control, Life Control and The Order
Member of: DK, CM, EdL, Northstar, RR, FTV, FI, SPB, TD, LoM, LB
Member of: DK, CM, EdL, Northstar, RR, FTV, FI, SPB, TD, LoM, LB
-
- Beginner Spam Artist
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 4:09 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: interest?
rejected, balance.